Date: 07/22/01
- Next message: nathan r. hruby: "Re: [phplib] phplib - what is the point?"
- Previous message: nathan r. hruby: "Re: [phplib] [RFC] Future of phplib"
- In reply to: nathan r. hruby: "Re: [phplib] [RFC] Future of phplib"
- Next in thread: Tarique Sani
email protected>>: "Re: [phplib] [RFC] Future of phplib" - Reply: Tarique Sani
email protected>>: "Re: [phplib] [RFC] Future of phplib" - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Good! Then I would be one to say "Go for it!"
It would seem to me that one of the most important factors is to choose some
approach that facilitates -- and also engenders -- the most participation from all.
The very fact that this discussion is going on and that you are taking a lead in
doing something is very encouraging.
Cheers!
"nathan r. hruby" wrote:
> Chris and I have already talked about it. He saw and editied the RFC
> before it went to the list, here's his reply.
>
> ---------------------------------------
> Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 21:36:02 -0500
> From: Chris Johnson <chris <email protected>>
> To: Nathan R. Hruby <nhruby <email protected>>
> Subject: Moving PHPLib to SourceForge
>
> [ The following text is in the "iso-8859-1" character set. ]
> [ Your display is set for the "US-ASCII" character set. ]
> [ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]
>
> Nathan,
>
> Here's my edited version of your posting. It's really unchanged as to
> content and meaning. I just fixed all the typos and clarified some
> sentences and grammar so that folks who speak English as a second
> language aren't as easily confused.
>
> I completely support your proposal, and will volunteer to help with bug
> fixes and development, maybe even documentation.
>
> I like PHP's documentation method (their actual documentation is not
> very good) where the users can add their comments and suggestions to the
> bottom of each manual page. I've learned a lot from those comments over
> the years! I wonder how hard it would be to set something up like that
> for PHPLib?
>
> Regards,
> ..chris
>
> -----------------------------------------
> On Sun, 22 Jul 2001, Mike Green wrote:
>
> > Well, I have noticed that much of the recent work seems to have been being
> > done by Chris Johnson. And I've not seen him weigh in on the present
> > discussion. Since he had been trying so hard to keep something going with
> > PHPLib, it seems to me that it would be good to hear from him before leaping.
> >
> > (I'm one of those who -- at present at least -- can't do more than read this
> > list. I can't keep up with other things that I'm committed to. So I don't feel
> > I really have a right to comment. But I am very interested in PHPLib and have
> > used it extensively in the reasonably recent past and hope to do so again. To
> > me it is a very valuable resource.)
> >
> >
>
> -n
> --
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> nathan hruby / digital statement
> nathan <email protected>
> http://www.dstatement.com/
>
> Public GPG key can be found at:
> http://www.dstatement.com/nathan-gpg-key.txt
> ED54 9A5E 132D BD01 9103 EEF3 E1B9 4738 EC90 801B
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-- Mike Green SaeSolved:: http://www.saesolved.com http://www.everypeople.net http://www.sitewidgets.com http://www.widgetchuck.com-- Abbestellen mit Mail an: phplib-unsubscribe <email protected> Kommandoliste mit Mail an: phplib-help <email protected>
- Next message: nathan r. hruby: "Re: [phplib] phplib - what is the point?"
- Previous message: nathan r. hruby: "Re: [phplib] [RFC] Future of phplib"
- In reply to: nathan r. hruby: "Re: [phplib] [RFC] Future of phplib"
- Next in thread: Tarique Sani
email protected>>: "Re: [phplib] [RFC] Future of phplib" - Reply: Tarique Sani
email protected>>: "Re: [phplib] [RFC] Future of phplib" - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

