Date: 07/23/01
- Next message: Richard Archer: "Re: [phplib] HTML_Template & PHPLib 7.2d"
- Previous message: Guillaume Desclaux: "Re: [phplib] Thoughts about Auth merging to PEAR"
- In reply to: Kristian Koehntopp: "Re: [phplib] [RFC] Future of phplib"
- Next in thread: Chris Johnson: "RE: [phplib] [RFC] Future of phplib"
- Reply: Chris Johnson: "RE: [phplib] [RFC] Future of phplib"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kristian Koehntopp" <kris <email protected>>
Newsgroups: netuse.lists.phplib
To: <phplib <email protected>>
Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2001 9:15 PM
Subject: Re: [phplib] [RFC] Future of phplib
> In netuse.lists.phplib you write:
> >because you use atomic permission scheme, and make every 'level' work
as
> >a group.
>
> In fact permissions, and groups, should be kept in a database. The
schema
> used by PHPLIB at the moment sucks.
>
> Define users, groups and permissions as tables:
...
> All code is PHP4 only, and requires register_globals set to Off,
> as should be standard in all installations anyway (unless you
> want to lose your installation to some script kiddie fast).
GREAT improvement !
I'll be happy to see that in the future PHPLIB instead of wasting time
to try to move PHPLIB to PEAR... (especially if PEAR people reject our
library in profit of their...)
-- Abbestellen mit Mail an: phplib-unsubscribe <email protected> Kommandoliste mit Mail an: phplib-help <email protected>
- Next message: Richard Archer: "Re: [phplib] HTML_Template & PHPLib 7.2d"
- Previous message: Guillaume Desclaux: "Re: [phplib] Thoughts about Auth merging to PEAR"
- In reply to: Kristian Koehntopp: "Re: [phplib] [RFC] Future of phplib"
- Next in thread: Chris Johnson: "RE: [phplib] [RFC] Future of phplib"
- Reply: Chris Johnson: "RE: [phplib] [RFC] Future of phplib"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

