Re: [phplib] Thoughts about Auth merging to PEAR From: Björn Schotte (bjoern <email protected>)
Date: 07/23/01

* Guillaume Desclaux wrote:
> > Look at pear/ in your PHP distribution. Plenty of
> > classes.
> Without a web site to federate all these classes most people will make
> like you : they will think that PEAR is empty.

I have never thought that PEAR is empty.

> To prepare the migration of PHPLIB to PEAR architecture and conventions
> is a good idea but it is not a priority.

For me, it is.

> More over, the fact that the people from PEAR are very restrictive to
> source code from "outside" is not a good way to promote component ...

I don't care about people who are restrictive (I have
CVS write access to PEAR repository). Martin Jansen
(one of the PEAR-DEV people) said that my template
conversion yesterday was a very good step and he is
supporting it. So you see, PEAR-DEV people aren't as
bad as you imagine they are.
 
> And finally the fact that header comment blocks must appears like that :

Not for pear CVS module. 

-- 
PHP Schulungen und                        | International PHP Conference
Schulungsmaterial:                        |             05. - 07.11.2001
http://thinkphp.de/                       |      Astron Hotel, Frankfurt
http://rent-a-phpwizard.de/schulungen.php |  http://www.php-kongress.de/

-- 
Abbestellen mit Mail an:   phplib-unsubscribe <email protected>
Kommandoliste mit Mail an: phplib-help <email protected>