Re: [phplib] [RFC] Future of phplib From: Jesse Swensen (swensenj <email protected>)
Date: 07/24/01

on 7/24/01 6:06 AM, Björn Schotte at bjoern <email protected> wrote:

>> 2) I end up with PEAR code that is slower and less efficient.
>
> Prove it.

This was proved several times. Now that was 6-8 months ago, so maybe it has
changed, but I hear the same complaint from the PEAR list. So, the burden
of proof is yours. Prove that it is NOT!
>
>> 3) I have to wait another year or so before PEAR gets its act together
>> and actually releases this stuff in a usable state.
>
> Prove it.

It has been almost a year since it's introduction and 6-8 months since the
PHPLib/PEAR merger announcement. PEAR is still trying to decide what it is.
Again, the burden of proof is yours. Prove that it is NOT!
>
>> and as CPAN currently is) is a great idea. But the current
>> implementation and politics of PEAR are detrimental, and the bottom line
>> is not attractive.
>
> Why don't you do something against that instead of
> mourning and weeping around?

Stating facts, no matter how unpalatable they may be, are still the facts.
So, this group is NOT "mourning and weeping around", but are doing
something. We are blowing off PEAR (for now) and pushing a proven
environment forward. I might say the same to you. Put up or .... 

-- 
Jesse Swensen
swensenj <email protected>

-- 
Abbestellen mit Mail an:   phplib-unsubscribe <email protected>
Kommandoliste mit Mail an: phplib-help <email protected>