Re: [phplib] [RFC] Future of phplib From: Jesse Swensen (swensenj <email protected>)
Date: 07/24/01

on 7/24/01 6:57 AM, Björn Schotte at bjoern <email protected> wrote:

> * Jesse Swensen wrote:
>> This was proved several times. Now that was 6-8 months ago, so maybe it has
>> changed, but I hear the same complaint from the PEAR list. So, the burden
>> of proof is yours. Prove that it is NOT!
>
> Only because one class (PEAR:DB, for example) is slower
> than PHPLIB:DB, you can't say that all of PEAR is slow
> and that this is a reason not to use PEAR.
>
>> It has been almost a year since it's introduction and 6-8 months since the
>> PHPLib/PEAR merger announcement. PEAR is still trying to decide what it is.
>> Again, the burden of proof is yours. Prove that it is NOT!
>
> If nobody of you _LAZY_ PHPLIB folks is doing anything for
> moving PHPLIB to PEAR since the announcement from Kris at
> the beginning of this year, it's no surprise that PEAR seems
> to be a lazy thing for you.
>
>> So, this group is NOT "mourning and weeping around", but are doing
>> something.
>
> Haven't seen any productive work from you in the last
> seven months at this list.
>
>> We are blowing off PEAR (for now) and pushing a proven
>
> Buahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
> *laugh* you haven't done anything until I pushed the work with
> template.inc - you only have been discussing "moving to SF or not",
> but no productive things.

If you got the answers, lead the way. So us how. You do it. The rest of us
LAZY programmers will go back and get paid to use a proven environment.

But thanks for you input.... 

-- 
Jesse Swensen
swensenj <email protected>

-- 
Abbestellen mit Mail an:   phplib-unsubscribe <email protected>
Kommandoliste mit Mail an: phplib-help <email protected>