 |
 |
Find a programming school near you
php-db | 2004071
Date: 07/09/04
- Next message: Torsten Roehr: "Re: [PHP-DB] table locking ... not required ?"
- Previous message: Tim Van Wassenhove: "[PHP-DB] Re: table locking ... not required ?"
- In reply to: Michael Gale: "[PHP-DB] table locking ... not required ?"
- Next in thread: Torsten Roehr: "Re: [PHP-DB] table locking ... not required ?"
- Reply: Torsten Roehr: "Re: [PHP-DB] table locking ... not required ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michael Gale wrote:
> For the UPDATES ... what would have it in theory two people hit the UPDATE
> button at the exact same time ? Would one just over write the other ...
> cause that is fine ?
Whatever UPDATE gets there first will execute and the other one will
wait until it's finished to update. There won't be any contention.
-- ---John Holmes...Amazon Wishlist: www.amazon.com/o/registry/3BEXC84AB3A5E/
php|architect: The Magazine for PHP Professionals – www.phparch.com
-- PHP Database Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
- Next message: Torsten Roehr: "Re: [PHP-DB] table locking ... not required ?"
- Previous message: Tim Van Wassenhove: "[PHP-DB] Re: table locking ... not required ?"
- In reply to: Michael Gale: "[PHP-DB] table locking ... not required ?"
- Next in thread: Torsten Roehr: "Re: [PHP-DB] table locking ... not required ?"
- Reply: Torsten Roehr: "Re: [PHP-DB] table locking ... not required ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
