php-developer-list | 2000111
Date: 11/09/00
- Next message: Mark Musone: "[PHP-DEV] new CVS account"
- Previous message: tictactux <email protected>: "[PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #7722: script filename not passed to .cgi"
- In reply to: Adam Wright: "Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #7720 Updated: Return address instackoverwritten?"
- Next in thread: void: "Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #7720 Updated: Return address instackoverwritten?"
- Reply: void: "Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #7720 Updated: Return address instackoverwritten?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Adam Wright wrote:
> Only *nix systems have dynamic stacks, windows based programs live with a
> fixed size stack setup at compile time (last time I did win coding, anyway
> :). There are many other ways of dealing
> with a recursive situation that won't involved you running out. Either way,
> to far OT now for my tastes. Its not a real 'bug', live with it.
Ok, recursions are not too nice, except for prototyping, and I can
work around it.
What I'm talking about is the _insecurity_ _issue_ I can hardly live
with. AFAIK this is not because of recursions but too many nested
function calls.
-- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe <email protected> For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help <email protected> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin <email protected>
- Next message: Mark Musone: "[PHP-DEV] new CVS account"
- Previous message: tictactux <email protected>: "[PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #7722: script filename not passed to .cgi"
- In reply to: Adam Wright: "Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #7720 Updated: Return address instackoverwritten?"
- Next in thread: void: "Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #7720 Updated: Return address instackoverwritten?"
- Reply: void: "Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #7720 Updated: Return address instackoverwritten?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

