php-developer-list | 2000111
Date: 11/12/00
- Next message: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams: "Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #7696 Updated: libct.dll not found"
- Previous message: André Langhorst: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] $obj = new foo() patch"
- In reply to: Zeev Suraski: "Re: [PHP-DEV] $obj = new foo() patch"
- Next in thread: Kirill Maximov: "[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] $obj = new foo() patch"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> BTW, you can take a look and see the inherent difference between the two
> notations - in the first, we don't know at compile-time that
> $foo2->foo() is going to return a reference. In the 2nd, we do.
ic! you're preparing the ways from the "loose typed" to the "strict
typed" optional language extension discussed before to enable private
vars and co ;)
just kidding (in reference to your own words "PHP is a loosed typed
language"), I'm sure this issue is generating some headache, but I
believe you can understand that no one is happy to change his code
experiencing that a "thought-to-be-feature" has been deactivated because
it should not have worked at all properly
as already mentioned this "patch" is going to stay, thus I´d vote for a
"red mark" along with the 4.0.4 release
andré
-- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe <email protected> For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help <email protected> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin <email protected>
- Next message: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams: "Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #7696 Updated: libct.dll not found"
- Previous message: André Langhorst: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] $obj = new foo() patch"
- In reply to: Zeev Suraski: "Re: [PHP-DEV] $obj = new foo() patch"
- Next in thread: Kirill Maximov: "[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] $obj = new foo() patch"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

