php-developer-list | 2001041
Date: 04/10/01
- Next message: sniper <email protected>: "[PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #9471 Updated: Warning: $CS is not an object in /www/wwwx/index.phtml on line 25"
- Previous message: Ed Lee: "[PHP-DEV] RE: PHP 4.0 Bug #9471 Updated: Warning: $CS is not an object in /www/wwwx/index.phtml on line 25"
- In reply to: ih <email protected>: "[PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #10235 Updated: Segfault on domxml_root()"
- Next in thread: Alexander Bokovoy: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Date/timestamp on CVS versions.."
- Reply: Alexander Bokovoy: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Date/timestamp on CVS versions.."
- Reply: Joey Smith: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Date/timestamp on CVS versions.."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>X-Powered-By: PHP/4.0.6-dev
Just an idea..would it be stupid to have the date of last
CVS update included in the version string? Like this:
4.0.6-dev-20011004
Or maybe the timestamp would be better?
That way we could ask for it to be included in the bug report
if the bug submitter uses CVS. And could tell for sure
if a fix was in that version or not?
--Jani
-- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe <email protected> For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help <email protected> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin <email protected>
- Next message: sniper <email protected>: "[PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #9471 Updated: Warning: $CS is not an object in /www/wwwx/index.phtml on line 25"
- Previous message: Ed Lee: "[PHP-DEV] RE: PHP 4.0 Bug #9471 Updated: Warning: $CS is not an object in /www/wwwx/index.phtml on line 25"
- In reply to: ih <email protected>: "[PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #10235 Updated: Segfault on domxml_root()"
- Next in thread: Alexander Bokovoy: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Date/timestamp on CVS versions.."
- Reply: Alexander Bokovoy: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Date/timestamp on CVS versions.."
- Reply: Joey Smith: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Date/timestamp on CVS versions.."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

