 |
 |
Find a programming school near you
php-developer-list | 2001041
Date: 04/10/01
- Next message: virtan <email protected>: "[PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #10269: Installation fails at line 58 of file 'my_getwd.c"
- Previous message: derick <email protected>: "[PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #9801 Updated: mcrypt_encrypt dumps core"
- In reply to: Jani Taskinen: "[PHP-DEV] Date/timestamp on CVS versions.."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I think the timestamp idea is the better of the two, myself. :)
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Jani Taskinen wrote the following to php-dev <email protected>:
> >X-Powered-By: PHP/4.0.6-dev
>
> Just an idea..would it be stupid to have the date of last
> CVS update included in the version string? Like this:
>
> 4.0.6-dev-20011004
>
> Or maybe the timestamp would be better?
> That way we could ask for it to be included in the bug report
> if the bug submitter uses CVS. And could tell for sure
> if a fix was in that version or not?
>
> --Jani
>
>
>
-- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe <email protected> For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help <email protected> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin <email protected>
- Next message: virtan <email protected>: "[PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #10269: Installation fails at line 58 of file 'my_getwd.c"
- Previous message: derick <email protected>: "[PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #9801 Updated: mcrypt_encrypt dumps core"
- In reply to: Jani Taskinen: "[PHP-DEV] Date/timestamp on CVS versions.."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
