Justtechjobs.com Find a programming school near you






Online Campus Both


php-developer-list | 2002112

Re: [PHP-DEV] call_stack From: Andi Gutmans (andi <email protected>)
Date: 11/27/02

I'd probably go for class::function($arg1, $arg2).
Also take into consideration that the args aren't always available.

Andi

At 02:58 PM 11/27/2002 -0500, George Schlossnagle wrote:
>Is there a concensus on how arguments should be printed out?
>
>I'm shooting right now for a 'cluck' style backtrave
>
>class::function() called at file:line
>
>
>Perhaps
>
>class::function() called at file:line
> Arguments:
> print_r(args)
>
>??
>
>
>Andi Gutmans wrote:
>
>>That'd be cool.
>>
>>At 01:32 PM 11/27/2002 -0500, George Schlossnagle wrote:
>>
>>>I'll do it, if you want.
>>>
>>>Andi Gutmans wrote:
>>>
>>>>At 07:23 PM 11/27/2002 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > At 03:41 PM 11/27/2002 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
>>>>> > >On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Miham KEREKES wrote:
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >debug_backtrace() will be available in PHP 4.3.0 and higher.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > if someone has time to implement debug_print_backtrace() that would be
>>>>> > cool. Using the raw debug_backtrace() is a bitch.
>>>>>
>>>>>If you're trying to volunteer me it's not going to work :P
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Damn! Maybe someone else? :)
>>>>
>>>>Andi
>>>
>>
>
> 

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php