php-developer-list | 2002112
Date: 11/28/02
- Next message: George Schlossnagle: "Re: [PHP-DEV] C++ extensions and ext_skel"
- Previous message: Shane Caraveo: "Re: [PHP-DEV] C++ extensions and ext_skel"
- In reply to: John Coggeshall: "RE: [PHP-DEV] C++ extensions and ext_skel"
- Next in thread: John Coggeshall: "RE: [PHP-DEV] C++ extensions and ext_skel"
- Reply: John Coggeshall: "RE: [PHP-DEV] C++ extensions and ext_skel"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
The door has always been open, as it has always been possible. For instance,
the qtdom extension has some C++ components, as does the dotnet extension.
This just sort of facilitates the, uh, moving through said door.
If you're using ANSI/ISO-compliant (or mostly compliant) C and C++
compilers, like the gcc suite or MSVC++, there shouldn't be any problems.
(Famous last words, I know.)
I get at least two emails a week about this sort of thing, so clearly there
is interest. It seems that everyone who emails me is looking to do it on
either a personal basis or for some proprietary extension, so it's not like
PHP itself would suddenly become "polluted" with C++.
J
John Coggeshall wrote:
>
> AFAIK, PHP is designed to function on any standard ANSI-compatible C
> compiler (as a goal). Unless this has changed, I don't know if opening
> the door for C++ development is the best of ideas (IMHO)
>
> John
>
>
-- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
- Next message: George Schlossnagle: "Re: [PHP-DEV] C++ extensions and ext_skel"
- Previous message: Shane Caraveo: "Re: [PHP-DEV] C++ extensions and ext_skel"
- In reply to: John Coggeshall: "RE: [PHP-DEV] C++ extensions and ext_skel"
- Next in thread: John Coggeshall: "RE: [PHP-DEV] C++ extensions and ext_skel"
- Reply: John Coggeshall: "RE: [PHP-DEV] C++ extensions and ext_skel"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

