php-developer-list | 2002112
Date: 11/28/02
- Next message: Rick Widmer: "RE: [PHP-DEV] RE: Bug #2965"
- Previous message: Murali P: "[PHP-DEV] lstat in php"
- In reply to: John Coggeshall: "RE: [PHP-DEV] C++ extensions and ext_skel"
- Next in thread: Markus Fischer: "Re: [PHP-DEV] C++ extensions and ext_skel"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
There is nothing about using a C++ compiler that makes your code less
efficient. The primary determinant is still overwhelmingly the
programmer. C++ has *never* gotten in my way when writing extremely
efficient programs, and in fact I find it a great help.
The flip side is I've seen a lot of hideously inefficient "C" code. You
can write inefficient code in any language.
Keep in mind that PHP is a (usually) compile-at-runtime, interpreted
language :).
John Coggeshall wrote:
>Well, Personally I don't have any problem with introducing C++ into PHP
>so no argument there from me. I'm curious if using C++ as opposed to C
>would cause a performace hit?
>
-- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
- Next message: Rick Widmer: "RE: [PHP-DEV] RE: Bug #2965"
- Previous message: Murali P: "[PHP-DEV] lstat in php"
- In reply to: John Coggeshall: "RE: [PHP-DEV] C++ extensions and ext_skel"
- Next in thread: Markus Fischer: "Re: [PHP-DEV] C++ extensions and ext_skel"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

