php-developer-list | 2002112
Date: 11/30/02
- Next message: George Schlossnagle: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Zend fast cache"
- Previous message: George Schlossnagle: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Zend fast cache"
- In reply to: Sterling Hughes: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Zend fast cache"
- Next in thread: George Schlossnagle: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Zend fast cache"
- Reply: George Schlossnagle: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Zend fast cache"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Saturday, November 30, 2002, at 07:17 PM, Sterling Hughes wrote:
> The problem I see with an array approach from an api perspective is
> simply when a bucket
> is free'd, in order to have efficient memory usage, we'd need a second
> level array scan
> for every ALLOC_ZVAL().
>
> Perhaps a linked list would be a better choice for this, as we can
> just be smart about bucket
> access, and eliminate the need for a scan (could be possible I'm
> missing something?)
I agree, a singly linked list seems like a no-brainer; it's an ideal
memory-pool data structure because inserts and deletes occur only at
the front of the list (so they're constant-time), the links are free,
and the implementation is straightforward.
-- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
- Next message: George Schlossnagle: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Zend fast cache"
- Previous message: George Schlossnagle: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Zend fast cache"
- In reply to: Sterling Hughes: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Zend fast cache"
- Next in thread: George Schlossnagle: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Zend fast cache"
- Reply: George Schlossnagle: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Zend fast cache"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

