php-general | 2000071
Date: 07/03/00
- Next message: spoon fork: "Re: [PHP] Data Overload"
- Previous message: Chuck Hagenbuch: "Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-GENERAL] PEAR"
- In reply to: scottrus <email protected>: "Re: [PHP] include and require"
- Next in thread: Eris Ristemena: "Re: [PHP] include and require"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, 2 Jul 2000 scottrus <email protected> wrote:
> Because require() ensure that my sitefunctions.php file ALWAYS get included
> as part of the standard header vs the include() statment which may not
> ever get evaluated by the code.
I always use include and have not seen any case where it *may not* parse.
I would say, why NOT?? i don't think PHP is so moody ;)
There might be difference in the implementation of require() and
include() in PHP/zend engine? however i don't see any difference in result
of these two functions.
-- Regards,
-- Masood Nasir :-) [Systems Engineer] - http://www.masood.net ;)
-- One Net, Lahore, Pakistan. <http://www.one.net.pk>
-- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-general-unsubscribe <email protected> For additional commands, e-mail: php-general-help <email protected> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin <email protected>
- Next message: spoon fork: "Re: [PHP] Data Overload"
- Previous message: Chuck Hagenbuch: "Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-GENERAL] PEAR"
- In reply to: scottrus <email protected>: "Re: [PHP] include and require"
- Next in thread: Eris Ristemena: "Re: [PHP] include and require"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

